Justice Scalia: I don’t like torture. I’m—although defining it is going to be a nice trick. But, I mean, who’s in favor of it? Nobody. And we have a law against torture. But if the—everything that is hateful and odious is not covered by some provision of the Constitution.
Lesley Stahl: If someone’s in custody, as in Abu Ghraib, and they are brutalized by a law enforcement person, if you listen to the expression, ‘cruel and unusual punishment,’ doesn’t that apply?
Justice Scalia: “No, no.”
Stahl: “Cruel and unusual punishment?”
Justice Scalia: “To the contrary. You think—you think that you would—has anybody ever referred to torture as punishment? I don’t think so.”
Stahl: “Well, I think if you’re in custody and you have a policeman who’s taken you into custody—”
Justice Scalia: “And you say he’s punishing you?”
Stahl: “Sure.”
Justice Scalia: “What’s he punishing you for? You punish somebody—”
Stahl: “Well, because he assumes you, one, either committed a crime—”
Justice Scalia: “No, no.”
Stahl: “—or that you know something that he wants to know.”
Justice Scalia: “It’s the latter. And when he’s—when he’s—when he’s hurting you in order to get information from you—”
Stahl: “Yeah.”
Justice Scalia: “—you don’t say he’s punishing you. What’s he punishing you for? He’s trying to extract—”
Stahl: “Because he thinks you’re a terrorist, and he’s going to beat the you-know-what out of you.”
And this fucktard is on the Supreme Court? Thanks Bush for his appointment. Maybe Harriet would have been a better choice after all. If he is going to allow this for prisoners in American custody abroad, it will only be a matter of time before this is allowed for prisoners in American custody in the homeland.Justice Scalia: “Anyway, that’s my view. And it happens to be correct.”
No comments:
Post a Comment